Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kopp v. American International Industries
as 1:2026cv05463
Plaintiff:
John R Kopp
Defendant:
American International Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BARTLETT v. KOPP et al
as 1:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
DAVID BARTLETT
Defendant:
JASON KOPP and BLACKJACK EXPRESS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kopp v. American International Industries
as 2:2026cv05463
Plaintiff:
Christine Kopp
Defendant:
American International Industries Individually and as successor to Pinaud, Inc., Barbara Alice, Inc., Ed Pinaud, Inc. d/b/a Ed Pinaud, The Nestle-Le Mur Company, The Neslemur Company, The Neslemur-Company, for the Clubman line of products, Barrets Minerals, Inc., Brenntag North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Mayorga v. Kopp
as 2:2026cv05142
Plaintiff:
Norbin Mayorga
Defendant:
Marlyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Contompasis v. Kopp
as 1:2026cv07047
Petitioner:
Alexander Contompasis
Respondent:
Dep. Superintendent Marlyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxey v. Kopp
as 26-2242
Petitioner:
JOSEPH C. MAXEY
Respondent:
Sing Sing Correctional Facility Superintendent MARLYN KOPP
Weaver v. Kopp
as 1:2026cv06878
Petitioner:
Shawn Weaver
Respondent:
Marlyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00228
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abrahim Fata v. Joshua Young, et al
as 26-2739
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
MICHELE BURRELL, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS, GREG CHRISTINE, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS, JORDAN DAVIS, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
