Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00329
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00296
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Contompasis v. Kopp
as 9:2026cv01876
Petitioner:
Alexander Contompasis
Respondent:
Marlyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BMI OLDCOIn re: BMI OLDCO
as 26-20568
Petitioner:
In re: BMI OLDCO Incorporated Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Respondent:
Dianne LaSalle, Estate of Marvin R. Fields, Estate of John R. Kopp and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kopp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv01712
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kopp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kopp v. American International Industries
as 1:2026cv05463
Plaintiff:
John R Kopp
Defendant:
American International Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BARTLETT v. KOPP et al
as 1:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
DAVID BARTLETT
Defendant:
JASON KOPP and BLACKJACK EXPRESS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
