Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Richard T Hayden
Respondent:
Latoya Hughes, Cherryl Hinthorne and Kwame Raoule
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klespitz v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03315
Petitioner:
Kayden Klespitz
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goins v. Kettlekamp
as 3:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Georg Goins
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul and Sheriff Bruce Kettlekamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hulfachor v. Burke et al
as 3:2023cv03307
Petitioner:
Billy Hulfachor
Respondent:
Rohn Burke and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv03306
Petitioner:
Troy Woods
Respondent:
Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
