Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Municipal Credit Union et al v. O'Neal: Bey
as 1:2019cv06394
Plaintiff:
Does 1-5, Judge Noach Dear, Kam Wong and others
Defendant:
Charlesetta O'Neal: Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wong v. Unubun et al
as 4:2019cv05469
Defendant:
Deputy Unubun and Deputy Florence
Plaintiff:
Kam Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amato et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11849
Plaintiff:
James Quinlivan, Susan DeMaio, Jimmie Lee Boyles and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Wong v. Alameda County et al
as 3:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
Kam Wong
Defendant:
Alameda County, Gregory J. Ahern, Griffitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wong, et al. v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital
as 1:2017cv04595
Defendant:
Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, Charles B Wang Community Health Center, Allan Ho and others
Plaintiff:
Kam Wong and Hung Yip Ma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wong et al v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv01225
Defendant:
Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, Charles B Wang Community Health Center, Allan Ho and others
Plaintiff:
Kam Wong and Hung Yip Ma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
O'Neal: Bey v. Municipal Credit Union et al
as 1:2016cv00438
Defendant:
Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy & Fenchol, Robert Lee, Municipal Credit Union and others
Plaintiff:
Charlesetta O'Neal: Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wong et al v. Wong
as 1:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Choi Kam Wong and Meng Yan Wong
Defendant:
Kam Hong Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wong v. Wong et al
as 3:2014cv04760
Plaintiff:
Kam Wong
Defendant:
S. Wong and Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
