Cases 1 - 10 of 1,119
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Yiwu Wangliang Bags Co., Ltd., ZHU JING KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Song v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
Yalan Song
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shenzhen Lishun Electronics Co., LTD, 1Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Kang v. Travco Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv03391
Plaintiff:
Hae Sun Kang
Defendant:
Travco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
