Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Akash Dixit v. Fredrick Smith, et al
as 23-5972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKASH DIXIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK W. SMITH, BABITA TIWARI, TANYA SINGH and others
Akash Dixit v. Fredrick Smith, et al
as 23-5595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKASH DIXIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK W. SMITH, BABITA TIWARI, TANYA SINGH and others
Akash Dixit v. Fredrick Smith, et al
as 23-5246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKASH DIXIT
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK W. SMITH, BABITA TIWARI, TANYA SINGH and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 23-15473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
SINGH OBEROI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv03491
Plaintiff:
Karan Singh Oberoi and Ankita Ramkishore Kulhare
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Acosta v. 590-600 Realty Corp. et. al.
as 2:2021cv06835
Plaintiff:
Melvin Acosta
Defendant:
590-600 Realty Corp., Rajmattie Persaud and Karan Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SINGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55859
Plaintiff:
KARAN SINGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
