Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08084
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McCray v. WaterKotte et al
as 4:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Cody Water Uotte, Shane Jumper, Gerald Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Pritzer et al
as 4:2020cv04161
Defendant:
Ajay Jetwani, Gregg Scott, Dr J R Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. McHenry County College
as 1:2020cv04179
Defendant:
McHenry County College
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Patrick Smith and Karen Smith
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childress v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv03396
Plaintiff:
Craig A Childress
Defendant:
Karen Smith, Sally Hougas, Joseph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Chicago Housing Authority et al
as 1:2014cv09993
Plaintiff:
Michelle Pearson
Defendant:
Chicago Housing Authority, H.J. Russell, Ann Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv10397
Plaintiff:
Karen Smith
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06278
Plaintiff:
Erica Graham
Defendant:
Enterprise Recovery Systems, Inc., Karen Smith, Cindy Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
