Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson et al v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Karl Robinson and Niamh Bonus
Defendant:
Cheri Chisholm, Edward McCulloch and Patricia McCulloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robinson v. Harris Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv01615
Plaintiff:
Karl Robinson
Defendant:
Harris Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Karl Robinson et al
as 5:2013cv01414
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Guidry, Romeo Panisa and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Karl Robinson et al
as 5:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Guidry, Romeo Panisa and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Karl Robinson et al
as 5:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Guidry, Romeo Panisa and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Karl Robinson et al
as 5:2012cv02052
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Guidry, Romeo Panisa and others
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al v. Karl Robinson et al
as 5:2012cv01821
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does, Gerald Guidry, Romeo Panisa and others
Movant:
Lawrence Woods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
