Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Husband v. Malakoski et al
as 3:2014cv01146
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
J. Malakoski, S. Argueta, J. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Lawrence Karpen and Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KARPEN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01552
Plaintiff:
JAY L. KARPEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Njos v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Rear, Karpen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ari Bailey v. Stephen Forostiak, et al
as 11-8093
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent:
STEPHEN FOROSTIAK, Asbestos Coor. E.P.A., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, BOP Dir., CONNELLY, Asst. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-8030
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent:
DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
