Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Wiley v. Town of Danvers et al
as 1:2026cv13217
Plaintiff:
Shawn R. Wiley
Defendant:
Town of Danvers, James P. Lovell, Stephanie Wennerberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crowther v. Blakthumb Corp. et al
as 3:2026cv30026
Plaintiff:
KATE CROWTHER
Defendant:
BLAKTHUMB CORP., BLAKTHUMB PTY LTD, TRACEE INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Natal et al v. Natal et al
as 1:2026cv10800
Plaintiff:
Kim M. Natal and Heriberto Natal
Defendant:
Kate L. Natal and Adam Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv12523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
DeCastro v. Hiller et al
as 1:2025cv11610
Defendant:
Dale Hiller, Joshua Abrams, Kate Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Maria DeCastro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv10510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Piard v. Silvia
as 1:2024cv12368
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kate Silvia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby v. Petit et al
as 1:2024cv12015
Defendant:
KATE PETIT, AVIVAH DELABRUERE and RANDALL PETIT
Counter-Claimant:
AVIVAH DELABRUERE
Plaintiff:
Jessie Kirby
Counter-Defendant:
Jessie Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Piard v. Silva
as 4:2024cv40100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kate Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
