Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Kathleen Anne Miller v. Michael J Astrue
as 8:2010cv01307
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Anne Miller
Kenneth Kirk, et al v. Chief Justice Walter Carpeneti, et al
as 09-35860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH KIRK, CARL EKSTROM and MICHAEL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF JUSTICE WALTER CARPENETI, in his official capacity as ex officio Member of the Alaska Judicial Council, JAMES H. CANNON, in his official capacity as Attorney Member of the Alaska Judicial Council, KEVIN FITZGERALD, in his official capacity as Attorney Member of the Alaska Judicial Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU SCHOOL OF LAW and AMERICAN JUDICATURE SOCIETY
Sweet et al v. Ellingsen Family Trust 9/28/04 et al
as 6:2009cv06229
Plaintiff:
Alfred William Sweet, Evelyn L. Sweet, A.W. Sweet IRA and others
Defendant:
Ellingsen Family Trust 9/28/04, Kerry K. Killinger, Stephen Rotella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hinger et al v. Carpeneti et al
as 3:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Ward Hinger, Ward Hinger, Kenneth Kirk and others
Defendant:
Walter Carpeneti, James H. Cannon, Kevin Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington Mutual Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" Litigation
as 2:2008md01919
Plaintiff:
William P. Sweet, Mark Nelson, New York City Police & Fire Pension Funds and others
Defendant:
John F Woods, James B Corcoran, Thomas W Casey and others
In Re:
Washington Mutual Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" Litigation
Interested Party:
Multidistrict Litigation, JEFFREY N. LUTHI, Kim D Stephens, David D Hoff and others
Not Classified By Court:
Liaison Counsel
Petitioner:
Burton Rosenfield, WaMu Institutional Investor Group, Helaba Invest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
