Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kathleen D. Stewart v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kathleen D. Stewart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Stewart v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kathleen D. Stewart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
STEWART-BROWN v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN LOUISE STEWART-BROWN
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00588
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ellen Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stewart v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv05060
Plaintiff:
Kathleen O. Stewart
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kathleen Stewart v. AT&T, et al
as 09-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN A. STEWART, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications Inc and AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN-NON BARGAINED PROGRAM, formerly known as SBC Pension Benefit Plan and SBC Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program
Stewart v. AT&T INC. et al
as 5:2008cv00272
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Stewart, Kathleen A. Stewart, Kathleen A. Stewart and others
Defendant:
AT&T INC., AT&T INC., AT&T INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stewart v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00911
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A Stewart
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stewart v. AT&T et al
as 5:2007cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Stewart, Kathleen A. Stewart, Kathleen A. Stewart and others
Defendant:
AT&T, AT&T, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
