Cases 1 - 10 of 22
PIERCE v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
KATE MCNAIRY PIERCE
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Crissinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Nikee Kate Crissinger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Parks v. Heckard
as 5:2023hc02063
Petitioner:
Maurice Montrae Parks
Respondent:
Kating Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kate Lindsey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HUTTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ALLI LARSEN, DREW LARSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN v. POOLE et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and PAMELA LOCKLEAR
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH TREMAYNE BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTOYA v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01157
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
Glynis Kate Montoya
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BALDWIN v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00922
Defendant:
KATE POOLE, ERIK A. HOOKS, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH TREMAYNE BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kate Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
