Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Addison et al v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 4:2021cv09187
Plaintiff:
Angela Addison, Charlene Alewel, Kim Anderson and others
Defendant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Macormic v. Vi-Jon, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01267
Plaintiff:
Matthew Macormic, Eric Howard, Joyce Fryer-Kauffman and others
Defendant:
Vi-Jon, Inc. and Vi-Jon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aquino v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Catherine Aquino
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. , Andrea Kauffman , Karen Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00974
Plaintiff:
Kaleidah Jackson , Margaret McDowell , Mark Meyers and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiderlen v. USA
as 4:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kauffman v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv03388
Plaintiff:
James M. Kauffman
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Haines v. Kauffman et al
as 4:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
Timothy Haines
Defendant:
Joshua Kauffman, Dennis Kauffman, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sentinel Insurance Company v. Haines et al
as 4:2008cv00961
Plaintiff:
Sentinel Insurance Company
Defendant:
Timothy Haines, Joshua Kauffman and Dennis Kauffman
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
