Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Lee Kaufman v. Javier Salazar
as 5:2019cv01333
Respondent:
Javier Salazar
Petitioner:
Patrick Lee Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. Sumerian Enterprises LLC d/b/a Back Nine, et al.
as 3:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Sumerian Enterprises LLC dba Back Nine, Justin Kaufman and Sumerian Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garrett v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv01310
Defendant:
Kaufman County Texas, Cristopher Wray, Terry Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tomasella v. Division of Child Support et al
as 3:2019cv00771
Defendant:
Ruth Blake, Kaufman County, Kaufman County Child Support and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Tomasella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Kaufman County Jail
as 3:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Wilson
Defendant:
Kaufman County Jail and Sheriff Brian Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaufman County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv02270
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. F/K/A Watson Pharma, Inc., DOES 1-100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Kaufman County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rodriguez v. Kaufman and Broad Mortgage Company, et al
as 5:2018cv00336
Defendant:
BSI Financial Services, Ditech Financial, LLC, Kaufman and Broad Mortgage Company and others
Plaintiff:
Belkiss P. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
