Cases 1 - 7 of 7
J.H. v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
as 23-2195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J.H., by and through her Father and Next Friend, Scott Hartley
Plaintiff:
Scott Hartley, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U.S.A.
Scott Hartley v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J.H., by and through her Father and Next Friend, Scott Hartley and Scott Hartley, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U.S.A.
J H et al v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 5:2020cv06098
Defendant:
Dill Air Control Products, LLC, Dukes Cycle Sales, Inc. and Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U.S.A.
Plaintiff:
J H and Scott Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parra et al v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries et al
as 2:2017cv02433
Plaintiff:
Rene Parra, Sr. and Rene Parra, Jr.
Defendant:
Kawasaki Heavy Industries , Kawasaki Heavy Industries (U.S.A.) Incorporated , Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corporation U.S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rachal v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2008cv04591
Plaintiff:
Carl Rachal
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Becnel v. Sunshine Equipment, Co. et al
as 2:2008cv04491
Plaintiff:
Robert M Becnel and Robert M Becnel
Defendant:
Sunshine Equipment, Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thida Whirley, et al v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation, U, et al
as 08-5696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THIDA WHIRLEY, as Personal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of William Morton Whirley, deceased
Plaintiff:
JOE WHIRLEY, as parent and next of kin of William Morton Whirley, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
KAWASAKI MOTORS CORPORATION, U.S.A., dba Kawasaki
Defendant:
JIM BENNETT CORINTH, INC., dba Jim Bennett Kawasaki, dba Jim Bennett Corinth Kawasaki
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
