Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Keeley v. Town of Ramapo et al
as 7:2023cv08353
Plaintiff:
JOHN KEELEY
Defendant:
TOWN OF RAMAPO, TOWN OF RAMAPO PLANNING BOARD, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Aziz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
Muhammad A. Aziz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene-Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv04112
Plaintiff:
Helen Greene Johnson and Thomas Johnson, Deceased
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eugene (Gene) A. Roberts, William (Bill) Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hicks et al v. T.L. Cannon Management Corp. et al
as 3:2018cv01177
Plaintiff:
Emily Steitz, Danielle Bennett, Amanda Blesinger and others
Defendant:
Matthew J. Fairbairn, TLC North, LLC, John A. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv06168
Plaintiff:
Keeley Davis
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jimenez v. Barnaby et al
as 7:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Steven Jimenez
Defendant:
Barnaby, Deallie, Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Barnaby et al
as 1:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Steven Jimenez
Defendant:
Barnaby, Deallie, Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
