Cases 41 - 50 of 282
FLOYD v. KEEN JR et al
as 4:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
HENRY BRANDON FLOYD
Defendant:
LARRY KEEN JR and J HAMMOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEENE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02878
Plaintiff:
LUKE LANCE KEENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huertas Danner, Jr. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Andres Huertas Danner, Jr., Alan A. Chiras, Alejandro Sia and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Matthews and Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duncan v. Greg Kiser Trucking LLC et al
as 7:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Duncan
Defendant:
Greg Kiser Trucking LLC, Keene Carriers Inc and Joseph Allen Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KEENE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22210
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON KEENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS et al v. Atlas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv23519
Plaintiff:
Patrick Akerlund, Michael Alzati, Eric Anderson and others
Defendant:
JASON FRISBIE, ROBERT GIUDICE, ANDREAS KOUSTAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MCCLINTON v. WESLEY et al
as 4:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MCCLINTON and CALVIN MCCLINTON
Defendant:
ROBERT WESLEY, LAURA J KLOSSNER and MITCHELL KEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEENE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21204
Plaintiff:
JEREMY KEENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
