Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliehan v. St. Charles County Court et al
as 4:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Farland L. Gilliehan
Defendant:
St. Charles County Court, St. Charles County Jail, Dan Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. St. Charles County et al
as 4:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
I'Esha Shelton Short
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Sheriff's Department, St. Charles County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullis v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mason Gage Mullis
Defendant:
Mark Dobbs, Mike Jones, Dave Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moomey v. Keen
as 4:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Moomey
Defendant:
Director Unknown Keen, Unknown Food Service Supervisor and St. Charles County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parry v. Tomlin et al
as 1:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Lashondia Sue Parry
Defendant:
Josh Tomlin, LeAnn Ryan, Mike Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parry v. Tomlin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Frank Clifford Parry, IV
Defendant:
Josh Tomlin, Leann Rymes, Gaybyn Hazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons-Pollard v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv01100
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Simmons-Pollard
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
