Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. Siems et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Siems, Cobble, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Keener
as 3:2022cv00263
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Goins
Respondent:
Captain Keener and Sledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Carroll et al
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goins
Defendant:
Officer Carroll, Unknown Sargeant, Loudon County Sheriff's Department Booking Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mudd v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
William Mudd
Defendant:
Loudon County, Jake Keener, Deputy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Avery Sarten
Defendant:
Buddy Bradshaw, Henry J Cullen, Julia C Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keener v. Life Bridges, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keener
Defendant:
Life Bridges, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McClain et al v. Guider et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Investigator Kentner, Cody Fritz, Cpl Cathy and others
Plaintiff:
Manford W Meadows, Jr, Walter Smith, Christopher Allen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Unamed Loudon County Goverment Employees and Administrators, Corporal Angi Martin, Buddy Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Loudon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Loudon County General Sessions Court, Officer Dallas Hilton, Captain Keener and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Keener et al
as 3:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Layne Cole
Defendant:
Lt Keener, Angie Martin and Cody Bengel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
