Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Anant Tripati v. Daryl Johnson, et al
as 17-15988
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee: DARYL JOHNSON, Monitor Legal Access Services, ADOC, CHARLES L. RYAN, AURORA AGUILAR, Grievance Officer and others
Lewis Harry, Jr. v. Anna Jacobs, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16726
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEWIS A. HARRY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: ANNA M. JACOBS, KEITH HARTSUCK, VARIAN and others
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 4:2014cv02077
Plaintiff: Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant: Paul Edward Carter, Mark Pullichio, Nona Camek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Frame et al
as 4:2014cv00026
Plaintiff: Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant: Michelle Frame, Mark Pullichio, Nona Camek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camey v. Catsaros et al
as 4:2012cv00897
Plaintiff: Mario R Camey
Defendant: Dimitric Catsaros, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Gene Greeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ormsby v. Hartsuck et al
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff: Lambert J Ormsby, III
Defendant: Keith Hartsuck, Unknown Martinez, Unknown Washmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rene Orivel Sanchez v. Keith Hartsuck et al
as 2:2011cv06339
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Keith Hartsuck
Petitioner: Rene Orivel Sanchez
Vann v. Hartsuck et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00469
Petitioner: Charles Vann
Respondent: Keith Hartsuck and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hobbs v. Ryan et al
as 4:2011cv00466
Plaintiff: Donald Allen Hobbs
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Dora B Schriro, Sandra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert v. Hartsuck et al
as 4:2011cv00461
Petitioner: Matthew Carl Albert
Respondent: Keith Hartsuck and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?