Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Texas Pride Disposal Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02883
Plaintiff:
Keith Jones
Defendant:
TEXAS PRIDE DISPOSAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, TEXAS PRIDE DISPOSAL SOLUTIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and KEVIN ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGowan v. Kelly et al
as 3:2017cv01668
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee McGowan
Defendant:
John F Kelly, Mark Schwartz, Keith Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pollard et al v. Church of God in Christ Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pollard and J S
Defendant:
Church of God in Christ Inc, Church of God in Christ, Board of Bishops and James L'Keith Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S. v. CHURCH OF GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
IN CHRIST CHURCH OF GOD, CHRIST INC., BOARD OF BISHOPS CHURCH OF GOD IN and JAMES L'KEITH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. USA
as 4:2016cv00948
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Barron Keith Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00256
Petitioner:
Marcus D'Keith Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00091
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Marcus D'Keith Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00019
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Marcus D'Keith Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
