Cases 1 - 10 of 128
US v. Kelly-Martinez
as 24-1079
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIGIDO KELLY-MARTINEZ
Swint v. UPI News et al
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
UPI News, New York Times, LA Times and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vertex Towers, LLC v. City of Fall River Zoning Board et al
as 1:2023cv11608
Plaintiff:
Vertex Towers, LLC
Defendant:
City of Fall River Zoning Board, Daniel Dupere, James Calkins and others
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
Lessieur v. Kelly
as 22-1789
Petitioner:
SHAWN LESSIEUR
Respondent:
SHEILA KELLY, Superintendent, MCI Concord
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner:
FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent:
PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
Littlefield et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2022cv10273
Plaintiff:
David Littlefield, Michelle Littlefield, Tracy Acord and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
