Cases 1 - 10 of 826
Pinn v. Tarkenton Senior Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pinn
Defendant:
Tarkenton Senior Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roger Ussery
Defendant:
Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridges v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bridges
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
All 3 Realty, LLC v. Grant et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
All 3 Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Kristi Grant and Carolyn Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. White et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Kelly
Defendant:
Officer Aaron White, Officer Choan Pinkston and Cobb County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson v. Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dickerson
Defendant:
Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. and Priscilla B. Faulkner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
