Cases 1 - 10 of 479
Kelly v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Brianna Kelly
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Upton et al v. Moulds et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
The City of Columbia, Mississippi, Michael Kelly, Seth Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ginger Upton and Sarah Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly-Patton v. Dismas Charities, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Colonel Christopher E. Kelly-Patton
Defendant:
Dismas Charities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Simpson v. Kemp
as 3:2024cv00407
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Amanda Kemp
Plaintiff:
Kellie Louise Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Kelly
as 3:2024cv00195
Defendant:
Moesha Kelly
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Kelly v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00124
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Demarco Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PH v. Belcher et al
as 1:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
PH, JB and DTC
Defendant:
Keshawn Belcher, Kelly Services, Inc., Ocean Springs School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DTC v. Belcher et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
DTC
Defendant:
Keshawn Belcher, Kelly Services, Inc., Ocean Springs School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JB v. Belcher et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JB
Defendant:
Keshawn Belcher, Kelly Services, Inc., Ocean Springs School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Optum Labs, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCay Hill
Defendant:
Optum Labs, LLC and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
