Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SANTIAGO-TORRES v. THE KELLOGG COMPANY d/b/a KELLOGG'S et al
as 5:2022cv02875
Plaintiff:
AIXA MARIE SANTIAGO-TORRES
Defendant:
THE KELLOGG COMPANY doing business as KELLOGG'S and JOHN DOE
Cross Claimant:
THE KELLOGG COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sapphire Crossing LLC v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Crossing LLC
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Principle Packaging LLC v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv00448
Plaintiff:
Principle Packaging LLC
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Heeman et al v. New Prime, Inc., et al
as 4:2018cv00433
Plaintiff:
Kevin Heeman and Derrick Walker
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc., , Bobby Robinson and Kellogg Company
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Bobby Robinson , Kellogg Company and New Prime, Inc.,
Counterclaim_defendant:
Kevin Heeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REMENTER v. KELLOGG COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv01340
Plaintiff:
TRICIA REMENTER
Defendant:
KELLOGG COMPANY and KELLOGG USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Grabowski et al v. Kellogg Company
as 3:2013cv03070
Plaintiff:
William Grabowski and Lynn Grabowski
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
