Cases 1 - 10 of 5,781
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Davies v. The Bank of Missouri
as 8:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Kelli Davies
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. April et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathleen April, Arthur E. Bailey, James M. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Singleton et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 6:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelly Singleton and Mathew Singleton
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Liu et al v. EB5 Global SF, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Nan Liu, Hao Liu, Guangxiang Xu and others
Defendant:
EB5 Global SF, LLC, MiMA Real Estate Partners I, LLC, Renoir HM, LLC and others
Pinn v. International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO
as 8:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pinn
Defendant:
International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pinn v. Tarkenton Senior Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pinn
Defendant:
Tarkenton Senior Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
