Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff: Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant: Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Longobardi v. Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a AlliedSignal Inc., as successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04367
Defendant: Kelsey-Hayes Company, Mack Trucks, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a AlliedSignal Inc., as successor-in-interest to The Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Pamela Longobardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Longobardi v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03877
Defendant: Mack Trucks, Inc., John Crane, Inc., DCO, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Pamela Longobardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Longobardi v. Paccar Inc et al.
as 1:2019cv02690
Defendant: Paccar Inc, Kelsey-Hayes Company, Mack Trucks, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Eugene Longobardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant: The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff: Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant: Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant: United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burns v. AERCO International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00232
Cross Defendant: Rockwell Automation, Inc., Goulds Pumps Inc, McCord Gasket Company and others
Cross Claimant: Howden North America, Inc., Carbonline Company, General Cable Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant: Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Plaintiff: Michael Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hasenberg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01325
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Cummins Inc., Georgia Pacific, LLC and others
Plaintiff: William Hasenberg, Jr. and Linda Hasenberg
Cross Defendant: Kelsey-Hayes Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Pneumo Abex LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff: Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant: A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant: Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant: Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant: Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant: Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?