Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Courney v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Courney
Defendant:
Anothy Wills, La'Toya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noland v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Kadeem Noland
Defendant:
Sergeant Jones, E. Kempfer and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Chisolm et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Spencer R McClain
Defendant:
John Chisolm, Eric Bashirian, Steven Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kempfer v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01124
Petitioner:
Kayla S. Kempfer
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberson v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv01362
Plaintiff:
Edward Roberson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, John Doe Rowland, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEMPFER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08955
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BLAKE KEMPFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allsup v. Kempfer et al
as 3:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
Brandon Allsup
Defendant:
Sgt. Harris, C/O Wilson and C/O Kempfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padin v. Officer Justin Kempfer et al
as 3:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Officer Kramer, Officer Dane T. Wells, Officer John Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Padin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kempfer v. National College of Business and Technology Company, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kempfer
Defendant:
National College of Buisness and Technology Company, Inc. and National College of Business and Technology Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
