Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ken Gryder v. Freddie Mac
as 22-1767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN GRYDER
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDDIE MAC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, FREDDIE MAC BOARD OF DIRECTORS, GREG WATCHMAN and others
Ken Gryder v. Freddie Mac
as 22-1570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN GRYDER
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDDIE MAC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, FREDDIE MAC BOARD OF DIRECTORS, GREG WATCHMAN and others
Gryder v. Freddie Mac et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Defendant:
Freddie Mac, Freddie Mac Board of Directors, Greg Watchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ken Gryder v. Concept Plus, LLC
as 21-1380
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK HERRING, VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, ADP TOTALSOURCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN GRYDER
Ken Gryder v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-1357
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Richard Holcomb DMV Commissioner, STAFFORD DEPUTY RENALDI MERVIL, SHANK'S TOWING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN GRYDER
Gryder v. Concept Plus LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant:
ADP Totalsource, Concept Plus LLC, Virginia Employment Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gryder v. Commonwealth of Virgnia et al
as 1:2021cv00262
Defendant:
Stafford Deputy Renaldi Mervil, Laura Rudy, Robert Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gryder v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2020cv00695
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gryder et al v. The Common wealth of Virgina et al
as 1:2019cv01548
Defendant:
Courthouse Apartments Stafford, Scott Mayausky, Laura Rudy and others
Plaintiff:
Divina Gryder and Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
