Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Kenneth Davis v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50977
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WADE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kenneth Davis v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50853
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WADE DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
American Credit Acceptance, LLC v. Patriot Credit Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00388
Plaintiff:
American Credit Acceptance, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Davis, Mark B. Davis, Freedom Auto Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02865
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Beers Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Director, TDCJCID
as 1:2014cv00609
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wade Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJCID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Davis v. Timothy Keith
as 14-30505
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH D. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY KEITH, Warden, Winn Correctional Center
Davis v. Winn Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Davis
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Hood v. Montgomery County Texas, et al
as 14-20040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY DALE HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS, KENNETH G. DAVIS, EDSEL WEST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis vs. Kroger (Do Not Docket In This Case Docket In 4:13-cv-2892)
as 4:2013mc02221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E Davis
Defendant:
Kroger Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
