Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pierson et al v. Lawley et al
as 5:2012cv14392
Plaintiff:
Randall Pierson, Nancy Landskroener, Lonzie Raymond and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lawley and Samantha Minehart
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pierson et al v. Lawley et al
as 5:2012cv14393
Plaintiff:
Randall Pierson , Nancy Landskroener , Lonzie Raymond and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Lawley and Samantha Minehart
COOPER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv03328
Plaintiff:
KENNETH COOPER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierson et al v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc et al
as 5:2012cv10176
Plaintiff:
Randall Pierson , Nancy Londskroener , Lonzie Raymond and others
Defendant:
Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc, DHL Holdings USA, Inc., National Union Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michael Mann, et al v. Kenneth Cooper, et al
as 11-3809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MANN, DDS, JOHN SEDOR, DDS and DRS. MANN & SEDOR, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH COOPER, BRIAN JACKSON and DENTAL EXPRESS MIDDLEBURG HTS., Brian E. Jackson, D.D.S., LLC
USA v. Kenneth Cooper
as 11-3767
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH COOPER
Mann et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
Michael Mann , John Sedor and Drs. Mann & Sedor, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Cooper , Brian Jackson and Dental Express Middleburg Hts., Brian E. Jackson, D.D.S., LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
