Cases 1 - 10 of 27
JULY v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2016cv04568
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANTONIO CAMPOS, J. HINTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIBLACK v. MIGLIO et al
as 2:2016cv00747
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
ANNA MIGLIO, CHRISTY RALPH, JAMES MCDONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 1:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 2:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHIPPERO v. NELSON et al
as 3:2015cv06272
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHIPPERO
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LECUYER v. SPIERS et al
as 3:2015cv05639
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LECUYER
Defendant:
C. SPIERS, C. DANIELSON, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv04404
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLEY v. DISTEFANO et al
as 3:2015cv01512
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CONLEY
Defendant:
J. DISTEFANO, SALVATORE D'AMICO, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. NELSON et al
as 2:2015cv01219
Petitioner:
DELVIN WRIGHT
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KADONSKY v. KOCH et al
as 3:2014cv08105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
BRIAN KOCH, SID. OFF. WISE, V. WOJCIECHOWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
