Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Melvin Brecht v. Mark Kubinski, et al
as 14-35873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN BRECHT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KUBINSKI, Idaho Deputy Attorney General sued in individual and official capacity, PAUL PANTHER, Idaho Deputy Attorney General sued in individual and official capacity, LYNN MARTEN, Assistant Regional Commissioner for Social Security sued in individual and official capacity and others
Flickstein v. Apfel
as 9:1997cv07007
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Apfel
Plaintiff:
Hedi Rosalyn Flickstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
PASTVA v. APFEL et al
as 3:2011cv05176
Plaintiff:
JEROME PASTVA
Defendant:
KENNETH S. APFEL and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
-JC Carmen D Crites v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 2:1999cv12201
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Unknown:
Audrey B Collins
Plaintiff:
Carmen D Crites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hairston v. Apfel
as 4:2011cv00014
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Apfel
Plaintiff:
David A. Hairston, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carmen Lopez-Cham v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 2:2000cv10299
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Unknown:
Audrey B Collins
Plaintiff:
Carmen Lopez-Cham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daphne M Trejo v. Kenneth S Afpel
as 2:1998cv05662
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Plaintiff:
Daphne M Trejo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Herbert Booker v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 2:2000cv10199
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel and Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Herbert Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez v. Apfel
as 1:2000cv04185
Plaintiff:
Gregory Martinez
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Apfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alvaro Martins v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 8:2000cv00579
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
