Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Weigel v. Gray et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Allan Weigel
Defendant:
Lori Chambers Gray, Jason Cox and Mark Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Lawson
as 5:2021cv00449
Respondent:
Lonnie Lawson
Petitioner:
Jerry Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ellis v. Lawson et al
as 5:2021cv00404
Respondent:
Lonnie Lawson and William S Key Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Jerry Kent Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livingston v. MetLife Insurance et al
as 4:2019cv04082
Defendant:
Judge George Powell, David Ryan Michael & Associates, The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Lameika Sharona Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Jury Service August 5, 2014
as 7:2014mc00002
Defendant:
Tracy Ann Cobb, Paul Kent Ellis, Haily June Kramer and others
Lewis v. Ellis et al
as 4:2012cv00352
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mack Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
Kent Ellis and Patricia R Lykos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. USA, et al
as 08-20278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS MACK LEWIS, Sorereign Corporate Curtis Mack Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R W HANKS, BURTON H REIST and others
Lewis v. USA, et al
as 08-20279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS MACK LEWIS, Sorereign Corporate Curtis Mack Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R W HANKS, BURTON H REIST and others
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv01032
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mack Lewis and Curtis Mack Lewis, SR.
Defendant:
United States of America, R W Hanks, Burton H Reist and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
