Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2026cv00810
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Rex Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Bland et al
as 4:2026cv00654
Plaintiff:
Samuel Caldwell
Defendant:
Estella Bland, Silakhone Douangkesome, Jesica Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Kerstein
as 4:2026cv00625
Plaintiff:
Adrian L Waters, Sr
Defendant:
Gary Kerstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northcross v. WellPath Inc et al
as 4:2026cv00529
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Northcross
Defendant:
WellPath Inc and Gary Kerstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonix v. Lane et al
as 2:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Shane A Lonix
Defendant:
Steven Lane, Gary R Kerstein, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel v. Wellpath Medical Services et al
as 4:2026cv00487
Plaintiff:
Travis Manuel
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Services, Estella Bland, Gary Kerstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Culclager et al
as 4:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terrell Ramey
Defendant:
Aundrea Culclager, Kayla Hargrave, Silakhone Douangkesone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doerhoff v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC et al
as 4:2026cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Doerhoff
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Gary Kerstein and Tracy Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Slocum et al
as 3:2026cv00011
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Watkins, III
Defendant:
Ben Slocum, Kerstein, D Delgoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. WellPath Medical et al
as 3:2025cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pearson
Defendant:
Gary Kerstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
