Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co., Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc., Cresline Plastic Pipe Co. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones, Janet Jones, Catherine Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.G. et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv01171
Plaintiff:
J. G. and D. J.
Defendant:
Officer Kevin Jones , Officer Gary Crumley, Officer Kevin Kohuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 2:2016cv01126
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deeb v. Jones
as 3:2016cv02632
Petitioner:
David Deeb
Respondent:
Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones et al v. City of North Ridgeville, Ohio
as 1:2016cv02455
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones , Ryan Jones , John Zingale and others
Defendant:
City of North Ridgeville, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
