Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. McALEENAN et al
as 1:2019cv02085
Plaintiff:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN McALEENAN and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
People of the State of California, The et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01911
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary Elaine Duke and others
Plaintiff:
California Coastal Commission, The and People of the State of California, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Kelly et al
as 4:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Raul Grijalva
Defendant:
John F Kelly, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K McAleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
