Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Abdelhaleem Ashqar v. Russell Hott
as 19-6804
Respondent / Appellee:
RUSSELL HOTT, Field Office Director, Washington Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABDELHALEEM ASHQAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Nestor Loera Arellano v. William Barr
as 19-1574
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. THORPE, Atlanta Field Office Director for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SDDO VERONDA, ATD Supervisor United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NESTOR VICENTE LOERA ARELLANO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00641
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01465
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01433
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
