Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McCormick v. Renzenberger, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Kevin McCormick
Defendant:
Renzenberger, Inc. doing business as Hallcon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06750
Plaintiff:
Quarnita James, Lazerick James and Jaylin Stiger
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Guadalupe Aguirre, Mohammed Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94375
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, YORK COUNTY, KEVIN MCCORMICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01059
Plaintiff:
BTICG Leasing, Inc., Wayne Lewis, Aginty, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Textron Aviation Rhode Island, Inc., Textron Inc, Textron Aviation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laird v. Elliott et al
as 3:2019cv00716
Defendant:
Aaron Shaw, Municipality of Olney, Illinois, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Laird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin McCormick v. Namaste Technologies Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08616
Defendant:
Namaste Technologies Inc., Philip van den Berg, Kenneth Ngo and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mccormick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCCORMICK v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCCORMICK
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
