Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Mayo v. Spotten et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Mayo
Defendant:
Kerri Spotten, Jane Doe, Marissa Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-900
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Traylor v. Pacciuco LLC
as 24-691
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER TRAYLOR
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERFORD, LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD LANGHAMMER, LLC, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tr Fed. Question: Trademark
Tankersley v. Murphy
as 1:2024cv01754
Plaintiff:
Tavares-Maurice Tankersley
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
