Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carter v. Strong et al
as 4:2023cv03931
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Carter
Defendant:
Kelly L Strong, Bob Castleberry, Michael Kukua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Lumpkin
as 6:2021cv00031
Respondent:
TDCJ, Respondent Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Kevin Paul Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00119
Respondent:
TDCJ, Respondent Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Kevin Paul Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Walker et al
as 1:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CHASE BANK OF TEXAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR SAXON ASSET SECURITIES T and The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Kevin Paul Segars and Judith L Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. Unknown Defendants
as 2:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Hubbard
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00292
Petitioner:
Kevin Paul Hubbard
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00311
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
512:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Hopel v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01157
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Hopel and Kevin Paul Hopel
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
