Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Marco Guirlando v. Union County Jail, et al
as 21-3665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marco Anthony Guirlando
Defendant / Appellee:
Union County Jail, also known as Union County Detention Center, Captain Richard Mitcham, Ricky Roberts, Sheriff, Union County and others
Guirlando v. Sheriff David Norwood, et al
as 1:2021cv01015
Defendant:
City Tele Coin, Lt. Paul Kugler, Lt. Billy Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Guirlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guirlando v. Captain Richard Mitcham, et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
City Tele Coin, Lt. Paul Kugler, Lt. Billy Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Guirlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guirlando v. Ouachita County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv00811
Defendant:
City Tele Coin, Paul Kugler, Deanna Hopson and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Guirlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schafer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2020cv01038
Defendant:
Jailer Kevin Pendleton, Ricky Roberts, Captain Richard Mitcham and others
Plaintiff:
Skylar Schafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Love et al
as 1:2019cv01036
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Pendleton, Jeremiah Wells and Sgt. Stephen Love
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zane Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Owens et al
as 1:2018cv01036
Defendant:
Mr. Bebby, Doug Wood, Jailer Michael Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Roberts , Richard Mitcham , Kevin Pendleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv01033
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Harper
Defendant:
Ricky Roberts, Kevin Pendleton, Richard Mitcham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv01030
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lynn Miller
Defendant:
Ricky Roberts, Kevin Pendleton, Richard Mitcham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
