Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Legacy Medical Consultants, LP, Successor In Interest to Legacy Medical Consultants, LLC v. Robert Houston McDowell a/k/a Houston McDowell et al
as 4:2026cv00944
Unknown:
Regional Healthcare Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Legacy Medical Consultants, LP, Successor In Interest to Legacy Medical Consultants, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Houston McDowell a/k/a Houston McDowell, Kelly Mort, Guardian Biologics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Robson et al v. Smith
as 6:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Kevin Robson and Catherine Robson
Defendant:
Cynthia Sydney Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Young v. Robson, et al
as 11-4055
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN ROBSON, DANIEL FREDERICK BERTCH, BERTCH ROBSON and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON DUVAL, GREGORY HANSEN and DUVAL HAWS & MOODY, P.C., FKA Duval Haws & Frei, FKA Duval Haws Moody & Frei
Young v. Robson, et al
as 09-4184
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN ROBSON, DANIEL BERTCH, BERTCH ROBSON and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON DUVAL, GREGORY HANSEN and DUVAL HAWS & MOODY, P.C., FKA Duval Haws & Frei, FKA Duval Haws Moody & Frei
Young v. Robson et al
as 2:2007cv00643
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Kevin Robson, Daniel Bertch, Bertch & Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
