Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WALTERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WALTERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WALTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv34738
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Great Northern Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv03355
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
Great Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOONEY v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00920
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WALTER MOONEY
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv06750
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walter Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00920
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walter Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Ellis v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 15-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Municipality, Government Entity, OFFICER MATTHEW WHITE, City of Pittsburgh Police, Community Relations Officer, JEFFREY W. LABELLA, City of Pittsburgh Police Officer, Indv. & Entity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
