Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Danhach v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2016cv03160
Petitioner:
Sameh Khaled Danhach
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fekih-Romdhane v. Acacia Research Group, LLC
as 4:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
Khaled Fekih-Romdhane
Defendant:
Acacia Research Group, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Acacia Research Group, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Khaled Fekih-Romdhane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
National Oil Well Varco, LP v. Sadagopan et al
as 4:2016cv02261
Plaintiff:
National Oil Well Varco, LP
Defendant:
Sadeesh Sadagopan , Majed Hamden , Khaled Zantout and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Mustafa v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Khaled Mustafa
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monarch Investments, LLC v. Aurrecoechea et al
as 1:2014cv01019
Defendant:
Candice Aguirre, Alejandro Aurrecoechea, Fernando Aurrecoechea and others
Plaintiff:
Monarch Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Boudreaux et al v. Schlumberger Tech Corp
as 6:2014cv02267
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Plaintiff:
Brock P Boudreaux and Khaled A Barake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Sameh Danhach
as 14-20339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMEH KHALED DANHACH, also known as Andrew
Khaled Mahmoud v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60232
Petitioner:
KHALED MAHMOUD
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Batiste v. Najm et al
as 2:2013cv05463
Defendant:
Faheem Rasheed Najm, Khaled bin Abdul Khaled, William Roberts, II and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Batiste
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
