Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Khaled Hawary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv04869
Plaintiff:
Khaled Hawary
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Ibrahim v. Suptho, Inc.
as 5:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Khaled Ibrahim
Defendant:
Suptho, Inc., Sean Lattimore, Jr. and Joshua Simoncic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robles v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Antonio G. Robles
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Khaled A. Tawonsy and Ammesh Petkar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Ramirez v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Israel Ramirez
Defendant:
Perez, Khale, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wafaa Seddik et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2021cv02106
Plaintiff:
Wafaa Seddik, Khaled Mohamed Said, Habiba Said and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC)Ramirez v. Khale
as 1:2021cv01237
Plaintiff:
Israel Maldonado Ramirez
Defendant:
Khale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Ramirez v. Khale et al
as 1:2021cv01213
Plaintiff:
Israel Maldonado Ramirez
Defendant:
Khale, Mendoza, Sean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
