Cases 31 - 39 of 39
White et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2010cv02528
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County Hospital District, Arif M Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. White and Sandra E. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davila et al v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00366
Defendant:
Phil Basak, Unknown Brewster County Sheriff Deputies, Iftikhar Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Davila and Marcela C. Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rivera v. Kalafut et al
as 4:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Rodulfo L. Rivera
Defendant:
Roberta M Kalafut, Manuel G. Guajardo, Melinda S. Fredricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll et al v. County et al
as 4:2008cv02970
Plaintiff:
Rutha Carroll, Herman Carroll, Sr. and Chastity Rodgers
Defendant:
Harris County, Tommy Thomas, Andy Viruette, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Khan et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2007cv07272
Plaintiff:
Abdul S. Khan, Abdul S. Khan, Hajera T. Khan and others
Defendant:
Harry Lee, Tim Stierwald, John O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KHAN
as 3:2007cv00397
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SHOEB KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
KHAN v. CITY/PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE et al
as 3:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED SHOEB KHAN
Defendant:
CITY/PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, Baton Rouge Police Department, JAMES AND JOAN DOE - BATON ROUGE POLICE OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2002cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
