Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Khan v. Garland
as 23-1490
Petitioner: SOHRAB HOSSAIN KHAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Khan & Son Company, Inc. v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv11057
Plaintiff: Khan & Son Company, Inc. doing business as Bin's Mart
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity, GE BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., CEO of GE, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM and WARD BOWMAN, Engineering Manager, GE intelligent platforms
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1236
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2023cv10067
Plaintiff: Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant: General Electric Company, Larry Culp, GE Board of Directors and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff: Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant: General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Shash, et al v. Biogen Inc., et al
as 22-1773
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADIA SHASH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and AMJAD KHAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: VICTOR D. MENASHE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: BIOGEN, INC., MICHEL VOUNATSOS, ALFRED W. SANDROCK, JR. and others
Defendant: JEFFREY D. CAPELLO and MICHAEL MCDONNELL
Interested Party: LEONARD I. SHAPIRO, ALEXANDER BONDARENKO, IGOR RABINOVICH and others
Khan v. Garland
as 21-1877
Petitioner: ASAF KHAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?