Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM I. FLANNIGAN, AKA Kim M. Berger, AKA Kim M. Fowler, AKA Kim I. Martin, AKA Kim Martinez-Butts, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, in their nongovernmental capacities, ERIC MELGREN, in their non-governmental capacities and others
AKERS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 1:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant:
KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD, JAMIE CONOVER, ALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 2:2021cv02042
Defendant:
Kim I. Flannigan, Kathy S. Hill, J. Conover and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03311
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Sarah Canty, Does Dental Department Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03225
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Sarah Canty, Kathryn H. Vratil and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Carter
as 20-3040
Appellant:
KIM I. FLANNIGAN
Defendant:
KARL CARTER
Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Not Yet Classified:
DAVID R. COHEN, Special Master
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Carter
as 19-3200
Defendant / Appellee:
KARL CARTER
Not Yet Classified:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Petitioner / Appellant:
KIM I. FLANNIGAN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2017cv03094
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kim I. Flannigan, Katherine Siereveld, Eric F. Melgren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
