Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Edward Olson v. Johanna Smith, et al
as 13-36062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD DEAN OLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHANNA SMITH, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., JAN EPP and others
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-15692
Plaintiff:
Tanya Kim Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15692
Plaintiff:
Tanya Kim Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re Field Asset Services, Inc., et al.
as 3:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fred Bowerman, Julia Bowerman, Tim Purkett and others
Defendant:
Field Asset Services LLC, Field Asset Services, Inc., Xome Field Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gray v. Bennett et al
as 3:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
William Gray
Defendant:
Ken Bennett, M. Geisel, Marc A. Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDermott v. Valley et al
as 3:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jason McDermott
Defendant:
Matthew Valley, Kim Miller, Diane Kaufmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Allan Patrick Reynolds
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Linda Gehrke, Kim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Huggins v. B-J Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Dino's Pizza
as 1:2010cv04862
Plaintiff:
Kim Miller-Huggins
Defendant:
B-J Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Dino's Pizza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Type:
Other Statutes
Miller-Huggins v. Yia Yia's Pancake House & Restaurant, Inc.
as 1:2010cv04861
Plaintiff:
Kim Miller-Huggins
Defendant:
Yia Yia's Pancake House & Restaurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Type:
Other Statutes
Miller-Huggins v. Spizzico, Inc.
as 1:2010cv04668
Plaintiff:
Kim Miller-Huggins
Defendant:
Spizzico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
